Publications banner
Taxnotes

IRS Won’t Challenge Passthrough Deduction for Cannabis Operators

By: Wesley Elmore

 

Speaking February 10 at an American Bar Association Section of Taxation meeting, Luke Ortner of the IRS Office of Chief Counsel (Small Business/Self-Employed) confirmed that decision, but he explained that when calculating the factors for determining whether a taxpayer is eligible for the deduction, section 280E still comes into play.

 

Section 280E denies deductions or credits for the business expenses of any trade or business that traffics in controlled substances, including state-legal cannabis businesses, other than for the cost of goods sold. Meanwhile, section 199A, enacted by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, provides for a deduction of up to 20 percent of passthrough income for qualified business owners.

 

Many tax professionals have argued since the passthrough deduction’s enactment that cannabis business owners should be eligible for it, pointing out that while section 280E states that no deduction is allowed for amounts “paid or incurred” during the tax year, the section 199A deduction isn’t paid or incurred. The American Institute of CPAs requested guidance on the issue in 2018, but the IRS hadn’t addressed it publicly until now.

 

Ortner pointed out that taxpayers with income above the thresholds of section 199A(b)(3)(B) and (d)(3) must have sufficient W-2 wages to support the deduction, but under the section 199A regulations, only amounts included in determining taxable income qualify. So for cannabis businesses, any wages not included in COGS aren’t qualified.

 

“To the extent that 280E might prohibit you from using those W-2 wages in calculating your cost of goods sold, 280E will impact your 199A deduction,” Ortner said.

 

As tax attorney Daniel Rowe observed in an April 2019 Tax Notes article, that means that cannabis producers will be more likely to qualify for the deduction than pure retailers.

 

Ortner couldn’t say whether the IRS would issue formal guidance on the availability of the passthrough deduction to cannabis business owners.

 

Domestic Production Activities

Jennifer Benda of Holland & Hart LLP pointed out that the IRS previously conceded that cannabis businesses were eligible for the section 199 domestic production activities deduction, which was enacted in 2004 and repealed in 2017.

 

That concession was noted in a footnote in a March 2022 Tax Court memorandum opinion, Lord v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2022-14. Benda represented the petitioners in that case, a married couple with ownership interests in two medical marijuana businesses.

 

The same framework for determining the section 199 domestic production activities deduction for cannabis businesses — that is, using the costs that aren’t disallowed by section 280E to determine the eligibility factors for the deduction — has carried over to the section 199A deduction, Benda said.

 

Speaking at a separate session February 11, Benda pointed to the IRS’s little-known position on the domestic activities production deduction as evidence that it sometimes takes a long time for the agency’s positions on cannabis issues to make their way down the ladder.

 

“What I’ve experienced . . . is that they’ve taken positions, they’ve changed their minds, and then it takes a long time for those positions to trickle down so that they’re actually being applied throughout the IRS,” Benda said.

 

The IRS launched a marijuana initiative in 2021 to provide more training and job aids to examiners and promote consistency in the cannabis area, and Benda said she hopes that initiative leads to more effective coordination across the agency.

Company Tax Notes
Category FREE CONTENT;ARTICLE / WHITEPAPER
Intended Audience CPA - small firm
CPA - medium firm
CPA - large firm
Published Date 02/17/2023

User-added image

 


Taxnotes

Tax Notes
(703) 533-4432
www.taxnotes.com

Tax Notes is the first source of essential daily news, analysis, and commentary for tax professionals whose success depends on being trusted for their expertise.

Tax Notes is a portfolio of publications offered by Tax Analysts, a nonprofit tax publisher. It provides comprehensive and impartial coverage of tax news, while its commentary contributes important voices to the discussion and understanding of tax policy.

Founded in 1970, Tax Analysts was created to foster free, open, and informed discussion about taxation. In 1972 Tax Analysts published Tax Notes Federal, its first weekly journal, featuring news, commentary, and analysis on federal taxation. In 1989 Tax Analysts added Tax Notes International, a weekly magazine focused on international taxation. Tax Notes State rounded out the weekly portfolio in 1991. Each magazine offers best-in-class tax commentary and analysis on the latest changes in tax law and policy, as well as on court opinions, legislative action, and revenue rulings.

Tax Notes has continued to innovate through the years, adding the online daily news services Tax Notes Today FederalTax Notes Today International, and Tax Notes Today State between 1987 and 1991. Tax Notes also provides several research and reference tools, as well as specialized services focusing on exempt organizations, state tax audit guidance, and international tax treaties.